Showing posts with label library of congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label library of congress. Show all posts

Saturday, December 31, 2011

Great Thoughts at the Library of Congress



by Gary Berg-Cross

Washington DC is a great city to visit for scientific and humanities treasures. One repository of humanist and intellectual expression is the Jefferson building of the Library of Congress. This Beaux-Arts palace was constructed from the wealth of the Gilded Age which yielded its prosperity to the more hopeful reform of a Progressive era. It was an age of science and technology celebrating in World Fairs and Edison seeming to invent just what we needed.

In this atmosphere the Library of Congress building was constructed,. The building as a whole reflects a Jeffersonian spirit, child of the Enlightenment idea that intelligence and an informed public is necessary for democracy and society. One can enjoy the joyful expression of this principle and many supporting ideas on the walls of the Jefferson building of the Library.

Above the windows of the great hall’s East corridor on the 2nd floor there are, for example, some very humanistic quotations:

SCIENCE IS ORGANIZED KNOWLEDGE
Herbert Spencer, Essays, "The Genesis of Science," Vol. ii, 1.

Around the corner, facing the staircase, a poet speaks:

BEAUTY IS TRUTH, TRUTH BEAUTY
Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn

On the other side of the staircase a 17th mediation on life and death:

TOO LOW THEY BUILD WHO BUILD BENEATH THE STARS
Edward Young, Night Thoughts, "Night," viii, 215

And around the corner, facing the Great Hall is something naturalistic philosophy:

THERE IS BUT ONE TEMPLE IN THE UNIVERSE
AND THAT IS THE BODY OF MAN
Novalis, Philosophy and Physics

The feeling of historical wisdom washes over me in the presence of these thoughts. Lucky visitors can enjoy these and more that show some of humanistic cultural wisdom inherited from Greco-Roman times up to the great writers, thinkers and artists of the 19th century. They have much to say that is worth reflecting about in our times.

THE NOBLEST MOTIVE IS THE PUBLIC GOOD Virgil



Wednesday, June 01, 2011

Touring Architecture, Historical Miracles and Secular Culture


by Gary Berg-Cross

I recently had a chance to visit Prague in the Czech Republic and joined a walking tour of its Old Town. I knew little of the Czech history that goes with this Bohemian city, so it was a good way to fill in cultural gaps while seeing the main sights. From the number of stunning churches visible, such the Baroque St. Nicholas, part of that history was obviously religious in nature. Actually the city area's history goes back to 880, when the Moravian Premyslid dynasty started Prague with their construction of Prague Castle on the overlooking hill. That dynasty also imported the idea of Christianity to the area and started the long development of Catholic culture and traditions by suppressing the older Celtic culture and traditions. This older culture was the Boii, a Celtic tribe that inhabited the region from around the 4th century BC and gave Bohemia its name. You can't see any remnants in Old Town, but could learn about them by visiting the main building of the secular National Museum complex. Together they house almost 14 million items. The original building from the late 19th century covers natural history and regional history in a magnificent setting like our Jefferson building of the Library of Congress. Other buildings cover culture, arts, music and librarianship. In contrast to older attractions in the city these are some great secular monuments.

My Old Town tour started in the large, central square whose own origin grows out of a late 12th century market. The next 200 odd years added surrounding buildings of Gothic, Romanesque, Baroque and styles. These now enclose a tourist active square which includes restaurants and galleries. Most tours include a standard set of stories explaining how wealthy merchants built some of the house around the Square. Private constructions were followed by bigger public or religious projects. These include the Town Hall Tower & Astronomical Clock, which gives the square its current name (Staromestske). The story is that the jealous town leaders blinded the clock's designer so he couldn't duplicate the clock in other towns. Sort of dumb like voting for people who have a narrow view of progress.

The religious history of the town and area is also evident from the prominent statue
of religious reformer Jan Hus on the Square. This was erected on the 6th July 1915 to mark the 500th anniversary of his execution as a heretic. Hus was a predecessor to the Protestant movement, a dangerous thing in a Catholic era. His death eventually led to many a long inconclusive struggles between his followers and Catholics in what were called the Hussite wars.

The tour guided us through narrow, medieval streets that take you back to a time when walking was a slower, curvy, cobblestoney activity. Half way through we stopped at a large Baroque church called St James. Like other churches it is filled with religious details and decorations. But there were a few special, religious stories that our Prague guide threw in. She started by pointing to what was described as a 400 year old mummified/desiccated forearm hanging just inside the entrance. The story is that it belonged to a thief who had tried to steel some jewels from a statue of Madonna sitting on the high altar. As the story goes, the Madonna grabbed his hand with a marble grip that he couldn't break. There he remained till morning when the monks came to Church. The story goes that they had to cut his arm off to release it from the statue's grip. To celebrate the miracle, and as a message to other thieves, the monks hung the arm by the door.

Our guide also added some analysis about the cultural messages evoked by unified architecture and art in the church. It was built over a long time but was being finished in the period we call Baroque. This is the period after Renaissance architecture when various architects got bored repeating 200 year old idea using simple symmetry and forms. The Baroque innovation was a more complex, radiating design form with odd additions. They began combining curving facades with large-scale ceiling frescoes, more dramatic light & opulent ornaments made of plaster or stucco, marble or faux finishing. All interesting features, but the guide's analysis went deeper. The analysis explained why Prague religious groups began adopting the architecture. The guide suggested that various churches starting using this to counter the humanist message of the Renaissance and reformers like Hus. The Renaissance had placed religion on the defensive but the church fought back with art, and displaced some of the focus on the natural world. The extravagant and mystical style we call Baroque was also part of the Catholic revolt against the realism of the Reformation painters.

As an example, St. James church was designed to impress, dwarf and overwhelm the populace in a space that pulls attention upward and away from the everyday world. This was accomplished through the massive size of the structures, all of them reaching towards the heavens. I'd seen great stained glass windows before with pictures depicted biblical figures and stories. Now I heard how their changing pallet of color through the day was designed to connect viewers to the "light of God." The idea was that: "every feature in the construction helped to remind the viewer that all life was connected by the mystery of God."

There was perhaps another message behind the dynamic architecture. Lines of sight lead from a center to different, surprising and sometimes upsetting images - so the severed hand fit right in. The disharmony in Baroque architecture and art was another tool. It could be used to make people a bit uncomfortable. This is enhanced by church images that suggest the idea of struggle in a hostile world. One speculation is that this was an effective subliminal message to remind people of the Hussite invasion which had earlier destroyed the city and damaged nearby Prague Castle.

On thing that this architectural-historical analysis did make me think of is more modern architecture and the ideas they express. I love the architecture of some of our progressive era, public institutions. A great local example is the unified architecture painting, sculpture, and glass of the Jefferson Building of Library of Congress, which I've blogged about before In Praise of Libraries. It, and other decorative buildings of that era, celebrate a high-minded idea of culture that contrasts with a purely religious one. They express a secular mix of optimism and humanism. There's no miracle arm on display, and it's full of more comforting and down to earth cultural wonders. And at the Jefferson Building you can be you own guide and find wonderful messages about access to knowledge, creativity, celebrating achievement, government and of course the evolution of the book. See http://myloc.gov/Education/OnlineActivities/Pages/onlineactivities/jeffersonsecrets/index.html. See also a Guide to the culture in the LoC's Jefferson Building.

Alas, the Progressive Era is long over and grand public structures seem a thing of a more daring past. Consider the difference in vision between the Jefferson Building and the more recent, vanilla LoC additions, such as the Madison Building. We are not likely to see such unified, cultural celebrations as the Jefferson building again. This side of Las Vegas I worry that our grandchildren (and their grandchildren) will have fewer public, secular monuments representing the current decades to inspire and grab their imagination in their time. Still in DC we may have more than in other places. We do have some Smithsonian additions and the MLK monument as representatives of the decades around he turn of our century.

Sunday, January 16, 2011

In Praise of Libraries and Librarians- ancient and modern





We are lucky in the DC area to have great museums and libraries. I was reminded of this yesterday when attending a talk by Fred Edwords on “Human Origins: When Religion Makes Science Museums Nervous”. Fred covered some the issues around the Hall of Human Origins at the Smithsonian (more athttp://mdc.wash.org/). The talk was in a local library. Museums and libraries are 2 of my favorite secular institutions. I just love libraries. From the time I could walk to one, I’ve had my library card and a rapid heart beat as I wander the maze-rows of books promising voyages into literary worlds. It’s one of those special secular and humanizing institutions.


My oceanic thoughts are well captured by Linda Sue Park in her poem “Why I Love Libraries”

I lose myself within the book-walled maze,
with no end to the promises in sight,
through passages to many worlds and ways.
The aisles meander pleasantly. A craze
of unread pages beckons, tempts, invites;
I lose myself. Within the book-walled maze

a googolplex of lexical arrays
for exploration flanks me left and right.
True passages to many; worlds and ways

that lead to corners sharp with turns of phrase,
and tales both commonplace and recondite
to lose myself within. The book-walled maze

reveals its pleasures slowly, but repays
the debt of time in thousandfold delight—
through passages to many worlds, in ways

mapped out by words. A sudden blink of light:
It's checkout time—they’re closing for the night.
I'd lost myself within the b
ook-walled maze,
through passages to many worlds and ways.


Here in the DC area we are especially lucky to have the Library of Congress (LoC) the nearest thing to a Googolplex of delights. This library always reminds me of that more distant and seemingly mythical public library that existed in Alexandria. If there is a prototype for a library this is it for me. The “Great Library” of Alexandria, founded about 300 BCE from a suggestion by Demetrius to set up a universal library to hold copies of all the books in the world (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria and http://www.history-magazine.com/libraries.htmlfor more details). It was research facility and had a governance use like the LoC since leaders like Ptolemy and his successors wanted to understand the people under their rule. Once underway the librarians expressed a goal was of collecting a half-million scrolls which the succeeding Ptolemies persued. At its height, the library apparently held nearly 750,000 scrolls. Ptolemy I, for example, composed a letter to all the sovereigns and governors he knew, imploring them "not to hesitate to send him" works by authors of every kind. Many of us have heard the story of how the Ptolemies copied books while boats were in dock. The extreme version is that “confiscated” any book not already in the library from passengers arriving in Alexandria. There is one story tells how Ptolemy III (~240 BCE) “borrowed” original manuscripts of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, using silver as collateral. He kept the originals and sent the copies back. But he did let the authorities keep the money. Oh to have at least the copies of some of those works were lost. We know that it housed Latin, Buddhist, Persian, Hebrew, and Egyptian works that were translated into Greek.

Recently some images of the library was brought to life for me by a film Agora (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agora_(film)). One of the film’s attractions was that it has rich recreations of what the library might have looked and felt like as a combination library and research center. But as a film it is also about the life of philosopher and perhaps last Alexandrian librarian Hypatia. The film is set in set in Alexandria, Egypt around 391 CE and is has a story line which combines women’s rights, science and religion. The film is a bit of morality tale about science and progressive stances being challenges by passionate,
religious fundamentalist – in this case early Christians and Jews who were not only in conflict with each other but with pagan and secular scholars who inhabit the Library at Alexandria in the movie. According to Wikipdia there was a real Hypatia who was a Neoplatonist philosopher, trained in the mathematical tradition of the Academy of Athens represented and a follower the school of the 3rd century thinker Plotinus, who discouraged empirical enquiry and stressed logical and mathematical studies. The contemporary Christian historiographer Socrates Scholasticus described her in his Ecclesical History'

“There was a woman at Alexandria named Hypatia, daughter of the philosopher Theon, who made such attainments in literature and science, as to far surpass all the philosophers of her own time. Having succeeded to the school of Plato and Plotinus, she explained the principles of philosophy to her auditors, many of whom came from a distance to receive her instructions. On account of the self-possession and ease of manner, which she had acquired in consequence of the cultivation of her mind, she not unfrequently appeared in public in presence of the magistrates. Neither did she feel abashed in going to an assembly of men. For all men on account of her extraordinary dignity and virtue admired her the more. “
Here end is described this way in a Smithsonian piece:

“One day on the streets of Alexandria, Egypt, in the year 415 or 416, a mob of Christian zealots led by Peter the Lector accosted a woman’s carriage and dragged her from it and into a church, where they stripped her and beat her to death with roofing tiles. They then tore her body apart and burned it. Who was this woman and what was her crime? Hypatia was one of the last great thinkers of ancient Alexandria and one of the first women to study and teach mathematics, astronomy and philosophy. Though she is remembered more for her violent death, her dramatic life is a fascinating lens through which we may view the plight of science in an era of religious and sectarian conflict.

Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/Hypatia-Ancient-Alexandrias-Great-Female-Scholar.html#ixzz1BDOiAhXW

In the movie Hypatia is a bit more of a modern, empirical scientist and performs Galilean experiment to test concepts of a moving earth. Although Hypatia's death has been interpreted by some, as it is in the movie, as example of conflict between religion and scientific inquiry, contemporary historians of science have a different view. She essentially got caught up in a political struggle. In the words of David Lindberg, "her death had everything to do with local politics and virtually nothing to do with science".
A final note. Some of the wonder of this universal library is now captured by the Bibliotheca Alexandrin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliotheca_Alexandrina).
This library is both a commemoration of the Library of Alexandria whose final lost is depicted in Agora and an attempt to rekindle something of the brilliance that this earlier center of study and erudition represented.